Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. We will be in touch with you shortly.

Median home sale prices pulled back from June's twelve-month high, but at $434,100 they remain nearly 2% above where they stood a year ago.

Median home sale prices pulled back from June's twelve-month high, but at $434,100 they remain nearly 2% above where they stood a year ago.

The Big Story
Quick Take:
  • Median home sale prices pulled back from June's twelve-month high, but at $434,100 they remain nearly 2% above where they stood a year ago.
  • Inventory declined in July, slipping below year-ago levels for the first time in months, and new listings fell sharply from June.
  • Existing home sales eased from June's pace but held slightly above last July, keeping demand roughly flat year over year.
Note: You can find the charts & graphs for the Big Story at the end of the following section.
*National Association of REALTORS® data is released two months behind, so we estimate the most recent month's data when possible and appropriate.

The spring rally takes a breather, but prices are still ahead of last year
After five straight months of gains carried the median sale price to $442,800 in June, July brought the first pullback of the year. The median home sold for $434,100, a 1.96% decline from June, though still 1.97% higher than the $425,700 we saw in July of last year. A modest summer dip is not unusual, and the bigger picture is that prices have climbed roughly 9.9% since January's $395,000 trough. On the financing side, the 30-year mortgage rate eased slightly to 6.43% in July before jumping to 6.69% in August, its highest level since last summer and a meaningful move away from the 6% low we saw back in March. That combination of a slightly lower price and a slightly lower rate trimmed the median monthly P&I payment to $2,254 in July, down from $2,286 in June. The catch is that this figure is now essentially identical to the $2,253 buyers were paying a year ago, meaning the affordability advantage that lower rates delivered earlier in the year has been completely erased. With August rates moving higher, payments look likely to head back up.
Inventory turns lower, and new listings drop off fast
Inventory data runs one month ahead of the other figures, and it tells us the supply build that defined the first half of the year has reversed course. July inventory came in at 1,540,000 homes, a 1.91% decline from the 1,570,000 available in both May and June, and now 0.65% below the 1,550,000 we had at this time last year. That is a notable shift, because inventory had been running above year-ago levels through the spring. New listings reinforce the story.

Sellers brought 423,732 new listings to market in July, an 8.58% drop from June and 2.55% below last July's 434,816. Seasonality explains part of that decline, since listing activity typically peaks in late spring, but the year-over-year decrease suggests homeowners are becoming a bit more hesitant as rates push back toward 6.7%. Fewer new listings combined with steady sales activity means the pool of available homes is likely to keep thinning through the back half of the summer.
Sales cool off from June, but demand is holding its ground
Existing home sales registered 4,060,000 in July, down 1.69% from June's 4,130,000 and roughly 3% below May's 4,190,000 high for the year. On a year-over-year basis, however, sales are up 0.74% from last July's 4,030,000, which means demand is essentially holding steady rather than deteriorating. That is a reasonable outcome given what buyers are facing. Monthly payments are back to where they were a year ago, and the run of price appreciation from January through June asked buyers to stretch further with every passing month. What is encouraging is that sales have stayed in a fairly narrow band between 4,010,000 and 4,190,000 all year, showing a market that has found a floor even as financing costs have moved around. Also worth watching in the background: the Federal Reserve's mortgage-backed securities holdings continue to shrink, falling to $1.93 trillion in August from nearly $2.07 trillion last November, which removes a source of support for mortgage rates over time.
Tighter supply is helping sellers, but the national market still favors buyers
When determining whether a market is a buyers’ market or a sellers’ market, we look to the Months of Supply Inventory (MSI) metric. The state of California has historically averaged around three months of MSI, so any area with at or around three months of MSI is considered a balanced market. Any market that has lower than three months of MSI is considered a seller’s market, whereas markets with more than three months of MSI are considered buyers’ markets.

Nationally, 1,540,000 homes for sale against a sales pace of 4,060,000 homes per year works out to roughly 4.5 months of supply, which puts the country as a whole comfortably in buyers' market territory by California's three-month yardstick. That said, the trend is moving in sellers' favor. A year ago the same math produced closer to 4.6 months, and with inventory down 1.91% month over month, new listings down 8.58%, and sales holding above last year's level, supply is tightening rather than loosening. The counterweight is affordability: with the median P&I payment back at year-ago levels and August rates at 6.69%, demand could soften enough to keep the balance where it is. As always, real estate is a highly localized asset, which is why you should check out what's going on in your local market below in the Local Lowdown!

Big Story Data

The Local Lowdown
Quick Take:
  • Single-family prices held above year-ago levels almost everywhere in July, led by San Francisco at $2,050,000 (up 24.87%) and San Mateo County at $2,123,000 (up 10.57%), while most other counties posted modest gains and eased off their spring peaks.
  • Inventory is the story of the summer. Just over 7,300 single-family homes were for sale across the Bay Area's four subregions, with declines ranging from 22% in Silicon Valley to 42% in San Francisco.
  • Homes are moving quickly, with seven of the region's ten counties clearing single-family listings in 20 days or less.
  • Nearly every single-family market in the region sits below three months of supply, and the condo segment is tightening fast behind it.
Note: You can find the charts/graphs for the Local Lowdown at the end of this section.

A summer step down that still leaves the region ahead of last year
July followed the script the Bay Area has written for the past several summers: medians eased back from their May and June highs while remaining comfortably above where they stood twelve months ago. San Francisco set the pace on the year-over-year comparison, with the single-family median settling at $2,050,000, down 4.65% from June's $2,150,000 but a remarkable 24.87% above last July's $1,641,750. San Mateo County posted the region's highest median at $2,123,000, up 10.57% from a year ago, while Marin County added 5.26% to
reach $1,750,000.

Elsewhere the gains were narrower. Santa Clara County was essentially flat at $1,900,000, up just 1.06% year over year and down for a third straight month from May's $2,050,000. Alameda County came in at $1,270,000 and Contra Costa at $865,000, up 1.60% and 0.93% respectively after peaking in May. Solano County was the month's monthly standout, climbing 3.59% from June to $606,000. Only Santa Cruz, Sonoma, and Napa Counties finished below last July, each by less than 3.1%.

The condo picture was genuinely split. San Francisco condos rose 4.17% from June to $1,250,000, an 8.93% annual gain, and Marin County condos reached $707,500, up 8.85%. San Mateo County condos added 8.88% to $840,000. Working the other direction, Sonoma County condos fell 18.84% and Santa Cruz County condos dropped 20.13%, though transaction counts in those segments are thin enough that single-month prints deserve caution.

The supply squeeze is now region-wide
Every corner of the Bay Area is short of homes. Silicon Valley counted 1,849 single-family homes for sale in July, down 22.18% year over year and 5.28% from June. The East Bay closed the month at 2,659, off 24.70%. The North Bay saw the sharpest contraction, falling to 2,645 units, a 34.04% annual decline and 17.96% below June, the leanest July reading in that region's two-year series. San Francisco had just 154 single-family homes on the market, down 42.11% from 266 a year ago.

What makes this different from a demand story is that sales have held up. Roughly 3,750 single-family homes closed across the four subregions in July, and each region posted volume that was flat to slightly higher than last July. The shortfall is coming from sellers. New single-family listings fell 4.59% in Silicon Valley, 4.26% in the East Bay, and 24.98% in the North Bay, with only San Francisco bucking the trend at a 13.5% increase.
Condos are following the same trajectory for a different reason. Inventory fell 12.84% in Silicon Valley, 7.78% in the East Bay, 21.52% in the North Bay, and 43.16% in San Francisco, but closed condo sales rose in all four regions, including a 39.2% jump in San Francisco and 23.44% in Silicon Valley. Condo supply is thinning largely because buyers are finally absorbing it.

Two weeks in the core, six weeks in the outer ring
Marketing times form a clean gradient outward from the region's job centers. San Francisco single-family homes averaged 13 days on market, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties both 14 days, Alameda 15, and Contra Costa 16. Marin County improved dramatically to 20 days, 41.18% faster than the 34 days it required last July. From there the clock stretches: Santa Cruz County at 25 days, Solano at 31, Sonoma at 35, and Napa the slowest in the region at 43 days.

The condo side is where the regional divergence is widest. San Francisco condos averaged 20 days, down 53.49% from 43 days last July, and Alameda County condos improved 29.03% to 22 days, the fastest pace in more than two years there. At the other end, San Mateo County condos slowed to 42 days, Marin to 55, Solano to 63, and Santa Cruz County to 70 days, nearly triple last July's 27. Napa County's 17-day condo figure is the outlier of outliers and rests on very few closings. The practical lesson for sellers is that attached-housing timelines vary far more by location than single-family timelines do, and pricing strategy should reflect the local pace rather than the regional headline.
Sellers hold the cards across almost the entire region
When determining whether a market is a buyers’ market or a sellers’ market, we look to the Months of Supply Inventory (MSI) metric. The state of California has historically averaged around three months of MSI, so any area with at or around three months of MSI is considered a balanced market. Any market that has lower than three months of MSI is considered a seller’s market, whereas markets with more than three months of MSI are considered buyers’ markets.

Measured that way, the Bay Area's single-family market is a seller's market almost without exception. San Francisco leads at 0.8 months of supply, down 42.86% year over year, followed by San Mateo at 1.2, Santa Clara at 1.6, Marin at 1.7, Alameda at 1.9, Contra Costa at 2.4, and Solano at 2.8 months. Sonoma County at 3.2 months and Santa Cruz County at 3.4 months sit right at the balanced threshold, both having compressed sharply from last July. Napa County, at 6.1 months, is the region's only true single-family buyers' market, and even that is down 33.70% from 9.2 months a year ago.

The condo segment still offers buyers more room, but the gap is narrowing quickly. San Francisco condos have moved all the way from 3.6 months of supply last July to 1.7 months now, and San Mateo County condos have tightened to 2.9 months. Marin County condos, at 3.1 months, are effectively balanced after sitting near 5.9 months a year ago. Buyers looking for genuine negotiating leverage will find it in Alameda County at 4.4 months, Solano at 4.6, Napa at 6.7, and in the 4.0 to 4.2 month range across Sonoma, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Contra Costa Counties. Heading into the fall, the message for the region is consistent: single-family sellers are negotiating from strength, and condo buyers should act on the leverage they still have, because it has been eroding all summer.

Local Lowdown Data

ActivePipe Message ID: 4012252

Let’s Talk

You’ve got questions and we can’t wait to answer them.